This report highlights the ongoing tension between state and federal immigration policies, particularly in sanctuary states like Washington.
While Trump’s plans to deport millions rely on cooperation from state and local law enforcement, many Washington sheriffs have made it clear that they will not participate in federal immigration enforcement beyond their legal obligations.
The varying responses from Washington sheriffs underscore the uncertainty surrounding the issue. Some, like Pacific County Sheriff Daniel C. Garcia, firmly state that immigration enforcement is not their responsibility, while others, like Pierce County Sheriff Keith Swank and Grant County Sheriff Joe Kriete, leave room for interpretation.
Klickitat County Sheriff Bob Songer’s outspoken support for ICE suggests that while formal cooperation may be limited, some sheriffs could still assist federal agents informally.
The Keep Washington Working Act ensures that local law enforcement agencies do not directly collaborate with ICE, but the law does not prevent federal immigration officials from operating in the state.
This means that while sheriffs may not actively assist in deportations, individuals arrested for other crimes—including minor infractions—could still face federal immigration enforcement if flagged by ICE.
The divide in responses reflects broader national debates over sanctuary policies, states’ rights, and the role of local law enforcement in immigration matters.
The lack of clear direction from some sheriffs suggests that legal challenges and political battles over enforcement will likely continue as Trump pushes forward with his plans.