Experts argue that the use of deadly force in the fatal shooting of a Florida airman cannot be justified solely based on the presence of a gun.
On May 3rd, Roger Fortson, an Air Force senior airman, was tragically shot six times by a sheriff’s deputy in his Florida apartment. Fortson, who was by himself and on a Facetime call with his girlfriend, had a gun in his hand as he opened the door, in response to a complaint about an argument.
Proponents of Fortson contend that the deputy’s quick action to use his weapon and his mere presence at the location suggest an unwarranted fatality, mirroring a concerning trend of Black Americans being shot by law enforcement in their own residences.
Authorities, however, argue that Fortson’s possession of a gun justified the use of deadly force, portraying the shooting as an act of self-defense in a life-or-death situation.
As the investigation progresses, policing experts emphasise that the mere act of holding a gun does not automatically warrant the use of lethal force.
It is important for investigators to take into account a range of factors, such as the information that was available to the constable and Fortson’s behaviour.
The presence of firearms in the United States, especially in states like Florida where gun ownership is high, brings added complexity to law enforcement encounters.
Ian Adams, a criminology professor and former police officer, emphasises that the mere presence of a firearm increases the potential danger, but it does not automatically justify the use of lethal force. He highlights the significance of evaluating behavioural cues that indicate a potential danger.
A body camera video released by the Okaloosa County sheriff reveals the constable confronting Fortson at his door. Fortson, who was armed, is shot immediately after opening the door, with the constable only giving instructions to drop the weapon after firing.
Sheriff Eric Aden supports the deputy’s actions, claiming it was an act of self-defense. On the other hand, attorneys representing Fortson’s family argue that the deputy mistakenly entered the wrong apartment.
Chuck Wexler, the executive director of a policing think tank, emphasises the difficulty that officers encounter when they have to make quick decisions in situations involving firearms. Experts recognise the unfortunate nature of the incident, emphasising the importance of maintaining a balance between officer safety and the preservation of life.
In the midst of the ongoing discussions surrounding police use of force, Scott Lacey, a former Air Force Special Operations Command officer, strongly condemns the shooting in Fortson as an unjustifiable act. Lacey expresses deep concern regarding the deputy’s actions and emphasises the need for accountability in this matter.
This is not the first time that the Okaloosa County Sheriff’s Office has come under scrutiny for its use of force, as seen in the incident involving Fortson. Previous incidents have sparked inquiries into the actions of deputies and the policies of the department.
As investigations continue and debates over police accountability persist, experts emphasise the significance of conducting thorough evaluations of use-of-force incidents and continuously striving to enhance policing practices.