The proposal known as HR-1 in West Virginia is stirring debate, as it could change the way citizens engage with the legislative process.
Currently, citizens can request public hearings on proposed bills, allowing them to directly present their views. However, HR-1 would replace these public hearings on the House floor with public testimony during committee meetings.
Supporters, like House Deputy Speaker Del. David Kelly, argue that this change provides citizens with two opportunities to voice their opinions—once in a subcommittee and again in a standing committee.
However, critics, including former legislator John Doyle, fear that this could limit the fairness of public testimony, as committee chairs would have the power to decide who gets to speak, potentially leading to bias.
Doyle also expressed concern about the short notice for committee meetings, making it difficult for citizens from rural areas to participate.
The shift in process is intended to streamline legislation and improve the passing of bills, according to Kelly, but opponents worry it could diminish public involvement and transparency in the legislative process. What do you think about this change?